[Licenses] Proposal for new "Commercial" clause

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Don’t we already have metadata for that? Jamendo used to do things along
these lines.

The numeric scheme sounds strange - assume you use 10% from each of 6
works, each requiring 20% compensation. Does that mean that if you earn
money with the derived work, you make a net loss?

Best wishes,
Arne

Maury Markowitz writes:

> I definitely like the idea of "ask for commercial", but I doubt the value of the numeric scheme. Perhaps a simpler solution is to simply change the name to "inquire about commercial licence"?
>
>> On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Martin Doucha <next_ghost at quick.cz> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to propose a new alternative to the non-commercial clause that
>> will both fit within the definition of Free Culture License and ensure
>> remuneration from commercial use by third parties.
> _______________________________________________
> Licenses mailing list
> Licenses at creativecommons.email
> https://creativecommons.email/mailman/listinfo/licenses


-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://creativecommons.email/mailman/private/licenses/attachments/20160925/6edaf648/attachment.sig>